Buried inside the Finance Bill 2083 is a provision that could matter more to individual taxpayers and small businesses than almost any headline rate change: a time-bound tax settlement (amnesty) scheme that lets you clear old, outstanding VAT, income tax, and excise liabilities — including cases stuck in dispute or litigation — by paying the principal amount plus a flat 1% surcharge, with all interest, additional fees, and penalties waived. If you have a lapsed registration, an unfiled return sitting in the back of your mind, or a case pending before the Revenue Tribunal, this window is worth understanding before it closes.
What the Tax Settlement Scheme in Budget 2083/84 Actually Covers
The Finance Bill 2083 introduces several related — but distinct — settlement provisions rather than a single blanket amnesty, and it matters which one applies to your situation:
- Settlement of assessed VAT, income tax, or excise liabilities: where the IRD has already assessed or reassessed a liability on or before 15 Jestha 2083, the taxpayer can clear it by paying the outstanding amount plus 1%, with all fees, penalties, and interest waived, if paid by the end of Poush 2083.
- Settlement of unfiled or under-reported liabilities: taxpayers who underpaid or simply failed to file returns can come forward, file the outstanding return, and pay the amount due plus 1% by the end of Mangsir 2083, again with penalties and interest waived.
- Settlement of pending disputes and court cases: liabilities currently under administrative review at the IRD or before a court/judicial body can be settled on the same "principal plus 1%" formula by withdrawing the case before the end of Poush 2083; this extends to income-tax and VAT cases filed under the Revenue Leakage (Investigation and Control) Act, 2052 as well.
- Excise licence renewal relief: license holders who let their excise licence lapse can renew it by paying only the FY 2082/83 renewal fee before the end of Ashoj 2083, with penalties for earlier years waived.
In every case, the underlying logic is the same: the government is trading a modest, fixed 1% premium for full and immediate cash collection, in exchange for writing off what is often a much larger accumulated interest-and-penalty balance.
Eligibility Criteria — Which Taxpayers and Tax Heads Qualify
The scheme is broadly available to any person or entity with an outstanding VAT, income tax, or excise duty liability, including sole proprietors, partnerships, and companies, whether the liability arises from a self-assessment, an IRD assessment/reassessment, or a case currently pending review or litigation. One notable carve-out: telecommunication service providers are explicitly excluded from the dispute-withdrawal settlement track, so telecom operators with pending revenue disputes should check the exact scope of the exclusion with their tax counsel rather than assuming the general provision applies to them.
The government has also extended a parallel provision allowing it, as the appellant, to withdraw cases at the Supreme Court level where the taxpayer agrees to settle — a signal that the administration wants to clear its own litigation backlog at the Revenue Tribunal and higher courts, not just collect from taxpayers who come forward voluntarily.
What Relief Is Offered — Penalty Waiver, Interest Waiver, or Both
Across the settlement provisions, the relief offered is consistently both: additional charges, penalties, and outstanding interest or late fees are waived in full, provided the taxpayer pays the underlying principal amount plus the flat 1% surcharge within the applicable deadline. This is significant because, under Nepal's standard penalty and interest regime, accumulated interest and fees on an old, unresolved liability can in some cases exceed the original principal amount several times over — meaning the effective savings from using this window can be substantial for taxpayers with genuinely old liabilities.
Application Deadlines and Process
The deadlines are staggered by provision, so taxpayers should map their specific liability to the correct track before assuming they have until year-end:
- End of Ashoj 2083 (mid-October 2026): excise licence renewal-fee waiver for lapsed licence holders.
- End of Mangsir 2083 (mid-December 2026): settlement of underpaid or unfiled liabilities under the annual Finance Acts, with the required return filed alongside payment.
- End of Poush 2083 (mid-January 2027): settlement of already-assessed VAT/income tax/excise liabilities, and withdrawal-based settlement of pending disputes and court cases.
In practice, the process involves filing (or refiling) the relevant return or application with your local Inland Revenue Office, computing the principal plus 1% surcharge, making payment through the IRD's standard e-payment channels, and — for disputed cases — formally withdrawing the pending appeal or court case as a condition of the settlement. Because each track has its own form and internal IRD circular, taxpayers should confirm the exact procedural steps with their Inland Revenue Office or a chartered accountant rather than relying solely on the Finance Bill's summary language.
Cost-Benefit Analysis — When It Makes Sense to Settle vs Contest
Settling is generally attractive when: the underlying tax position is weak or hard to defend, the accumulated interest and penalties are large relative to the principal, cash is available to pay now, and the taxpayer values certainty and a clean compliance record over the (often slim) chance of winning on appeal. It is less attractive when the taxpayer has a strong technical or legal argument that the original assessment was simply wrong — in that case, paying "principal plus 1%" means abandoning a case that might otherwise have been reduced to zero or a much smaller number through a successful appeal.
Because withdrawing a case under this scheme is generally treated as final, taxpayers should not treat this as a decision to make hastily under deadline pressure — see the note on professional guidance below.
Risks of Not Availing the Scheme Within the Window
Once the relevant deadline passes, the standard penalty and interest regime under the Income Tax Act, VAT Act, and Excise Duty Act resumes in full, and any accrued interest or penalty that would have been waived reverts to being legally due. For disputed cases specifically, missing the window simply means the case continues through the normal administrative review, Revenue Tribunal, or court process — with all the time, cost, and uncertainty that implies — rather than being closed out on favourable, fixed terms.
Why Professional CA Guidance Matters Before Applying
Settling under this scheme, particularly on the dispute-withdrawal track, generally functions as an acknowledgment of the liability and a withdrawal of your right to further contest it — an irreversible step. Before applying, it is worth having a chartered accountant or tax lawyer review: (1) whether your specific liability genuinely falls within the scheme's scope, (2) whether the underlying assessment has any defensible weaknesses worth preserving, (3) the exact "principal" figure the IRD will use as the settlement base, since this can sometimes be contested even within the settlement process, and (4) how settling might affect your standing in future audits or your broader compliance history with the IRD.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does availing the amnesty scheme increase my chances of being selected for a future audit?
The Finance Bill does not state that settling under this scheme automatically triggers or increases future audit selection risk, and voluntarily regularising past liabilities is generally viewed favourably by tax administrations. That said, taxpayers should keep in mind that filing a settlement application does bring a previously under-the-radar liability to the IRD's attention, so complete and accurate documentation at the time of settlement is important.
Can I use this scheme if I have never registered for PAN or VAT at all?
Coverage for entirely unregistered taxpayers depends on the specific IRD circular implementing the scheme; if you have never registered, the more relevant first step is typically to register for PAN and then assess, with a tax professional, whether your unreported past activity can be brought under the settlement window.
Is the 1% surcharge calculated on the tax principal only, or on tax plus any partial penalty already paid?
The provisions describe the surcharge as roughly 1% of the outstanding principal liability; if you have already made partial payments, including any part-payment of penalties, confirm with your Inland Revenue Office exactly how the remaining "outstanding amount" is computed for your case before submitting your settlement application.
Discussion