Nepal's FY 2083/84 budget delivered the biggest reset to personal income tax in over a decade. If you're a chartered accountant fielding client questions, an HR or payroll manager updating salary sheets, or simply a salaried employee trying to work out what your next payslip will look like, this guide breaks down exactly what changed, why it changed, and what still needs to be confirmed before you finalize any numbers.
Budget 2083/84 in one line — what actually changed for taxpayers
Presented by Finance Minister Dr. Swarnim Wagle on Jestha 15, 2083 (May 29, 2026), the FY 2083/84 budget speech rewrote Nepal's personal income tax table in two moves: the tax-free-equivalent 1% slab was doubled from Rs 5,00,000 to Rs 10,00,000, and the top marginal rate was cut by a full 10 percentage points, from 39% down to 29%. On top of that, the government merged the long-standing separate slab schedules for single filers and married couples into a single unified table that now applies to everyone. Taken together, these three changes mean most Nepali taxpayers — from entry-level employees to senior executives — will see a real reduction in their annual tax outgo starting FY 2083/84 (Shrawan 2083 to Ashadh 2084, i.e. mid-July 2026 to mid-July 2027).
Old (FY 2082/83) vs New (FY 2083/84) slab comparison table
The table below lays out the full comparison. Under the outgoing FY 2082/83 structure, individual taxpayers moved through six bands topping out at 39%, with a slightly higher first-slab threshold for married couples (Rs 6,00,000 instead of Rs 5,00,000). The new FY 2083/84 structure compresses this into five bands under one unified schedule.
| FY 2082/83 (Old) | Rate | FY 2083/84 (New) | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up to Rs 5,00,000 | 1% | Up to Rs 10,00,000 | 1% |
| Rs 5,00,000 – 7,00,000 | 10% | Rs 10,00,000 – 15,00,000 | 10% |
| Rs 7,00,000 – 10,00,000 | 20% | Rs 15,00,000 – 25,00,000 | 20% |
| Rs 10,00,000 – 20,00,000 | 30% | Rs 25,00,000 – 40,00,000 | 27% |
| Rs 20,00,000 – 50,00,000 | 36% | Above Rs 40,00,000 | 29% |
| Above Rs 50,00,000 | 39% | — | — |
Note: The FY 2082/83 table above reflects the single-filer schedule. Married couples on the old schedule had a slightly wider first band (Rs 6,00,000). The FY 2083/84 schedule removes this distinction entirely.
The new unified slab structure explained (single vs couple schedule merged)
For years, Nepal's Income Tax Act gave married couples filing jointly a marginally higher first-slab threshold than single filers, on the reasoning that a household with two dependents needed a larger tax-free cushion. FY 2083/84 does away with this split entirely. Every resident individual — married or single — now moves through the same five-band schedule. In practical terms, this simplifies payroll systems considerably: HR teams no longer need to track marital status as a variable in TDS (tax deducted at source) calculations, and the risk of misapplying the wrong schedule to an employee disappears. For couples who previously benefited from the slightly wider couple threshold, the doubling of the base slab to Rs 10,00,000 more than compensates, since it applies to both single and joint filers alike.
Why the top rate dropped from 39% to 29% — policy reasoning
A 10-percentage-point cut to the top marginal rate is not a small adjustment — it is one of the most aggressive personal tax cuts Nepal has announced in over a decade. The stated policy rationale centers on three goals: narrowing the gap between Nepal's personal tax burden and that of regional peers (several of which cap individual rates well below 39%), reducing the incentive for high earners to structure income as corporate distributions or shift residency to lower-tax jurisdictions, and broadening the formal tax base by making compliance more attractive relative to informal or under-reported income. The finance ministry has also framed the cut, together with the doubled exemption threshold, as part of a broader push to expand the size of Nepal's formally taxed middle class following recent political and economic transitions. Whether the resulting revenue shortfall is offset by higher voluntary compliance and a broader base remains to be seen over the next few fiscal years.
The 1% Social Security Tax on the first Rs 10 lakh — who is exempt
The first slab is not technically a zero-tax band — it is a 1% Social Security Tax (SST), a mechanism Nepal has used for several years to fund social security programs while keeping the effective burden on lower incomes minimal. This SST continues unchanged in its exemption logic under FY 2083/84: individuals who are already contributing to the Social Security Fund (SSF) are exempt from paying the 1% SST on this first band, since they are separately funding social protection through their SSF contributions. The same logic generally extends to government and other employees whose retirement contributions are routed through recognized pension or provident arrangements, though employers should confirm treatment for their specific scheme with the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) before finalizing payroll deductions. For employees not contributing to the SSF, the 1% applies to the full Rs 10,00,000 band, which at Rs 10,000 maximum is a modest amount relative to the savings generated elsewhere in the new structure.
What's confirmed vs what's still pending the Finance Act 2083 — caution for readers
It's worth being precise about what is locked in versus what is still being finalized. The budget speech itself confirmed the headline numbers: the exemption threshold doubling to Rs 10,00,000, and the top rate falling to 29%. However, the exact intermediate band structure — the precise cut-off points and rates for the 10%, 20%, and 27% bands — is being operationalized through the Finance Act 2083 and subsequent IRD circulars. Payroll teams and CAs should treat the intermediate figures referenced in this article, and circulating in other early coverage, as the best available estimate based on the budget announcement rather than final statutory text, until the IRD publishes its confirming notice. This distinction matters most for mid-level payroll systems that need to lock in exact TDS tables before the first Shrawan 2083 payroll cycle — re-running calculations once the official circular lands is the safer approach.
Worked salary examples at three income levels
To make the changes concrete, here is an illustrative before-and-after comparison at three different annual income levels. These figures are simplified estimates for illustration only — they do not account for individual deductions such as SSF/EPF/CIT contributions, insurance premiums, or other allowances, all of which reduce actual taxable income and therefore actual tax payable.
At the lowest illustrative level (Rs 8,00,000 annual income), the entire amount now falls within the 1% SST band under the new structure, matching what a non-SSF-contributing employee would have paid on the old schedule as well — the real benefit at this income level shows up for anyone previously spilling into the old 10% band above Rs 5,00,000, who now stays fully within the 1% band. At the middle level (Rs 18,00,000), the shift from crossing into the old 30% band to remaining mostly within the new 10%–20% range produces a substantial reduction in estimated liability. At the highest level (Rs 45,00,000), the combination of the wider lower bands and the 10-point cut to the top rate produces the largest absolute savings, though as a share of income the middle-income examples often see the largest proportional relief.
What Nepali CAs should tell clients now vs wait for IRD circular
Practicing CAs are already fielding client calls, and it helps to separate advice into two buckets. What can be communicated confidently now: the exemption threshold has doubled to Rs 10,00,000, the top rate has fallen to 29%, and the single/couple schedule distinction is gone — clients can start planning around these three facts immediately. What should wait for the IRD circular: exact monthly TDS deduction tables, treatment of mid-year salary revisions that straddle the FY 2082/83 to FY 2083/84 transition, and confirmation of whether any transitional provisions apply to bonuses or arrears paid in Shrawan 2083 for services rendered in the prior fiscal year. Firms should also flag to clients that provisional payroll figures run before the Finance Act 2083 is gazetted may require a one-time reconciliation adjustment once final rates are confirmed — better to set that expectation now than explain a correction later.
Disclaimer
This article is intended for general informational purposes and reflects the details announced in the FY 2083/84 budget speech as understood at the time of writing. It does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice, and figures used in the worked examples are illustrative estimates only. Tax treatment can vary based on individual circumstances, deductions, and the final text of the Finance Act 2083 and related IRD circulars. Please consult a registered Chartered Accountant or the Inland Revenue Department for advice specific to your situation before making any filing or payroll decisions.
Related reading: For a full sector-by-sector breakdown of everything else in the FY 2083/84 budget — corporate tax, VAT, customs, and a compliance checklist — see our companion guide, Budget 2083/84 Tax Changes in Nepal: A Practical Compliance Checklist for CAs and Businesses. We'll also be covering payroll transition mechanics for the Shrawan 2083 cutover in an upcoming post.
Discussion